Philadelphia Primate Head Study Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Philadelphia prelate Head Study - Essay ExampleSome decades ago, the federal government had to suspend the funding of the Universitys Head Injury Clinical Research Laboratory. The reigning president back then, Sheldon Hackney, further issued a directing to stop the institutions uptake of animal experiments aimed at discovering the best treatment for victims of trauma-related brain damage. The directional served as a timely response to a preliminary report by the National build of Health (NIH) aimed at halting a particular baboon research project (Meyer 1). In my honest opinion, the use of primates in studies should be abolished because it is disrespectful to anatomy, unjust and goes against the ethics of beneficence and non-maleficence.In May 1984, animal(prenominal) Liberation Front (ALF) activists intruded the deserted Philadelphia campus of The University of Pennsylvania and took several videos of animals suffering during various head tests (Orlans 71). The videos captured m ore than 60 hours of enforced baboon-suffering through bombarding of the primates heads using pistons in order to induce brain injuries. People for the respectable Treatment of Animals (PETA) made claims that the videotapes showed actions of repeated violations of federal policies that govern the humane use of animals in research laboratories (Orlans 71). In the experiments, scientists disregarded the use of surgical asepsis and employed a very insignificant amount of anaesthesia to the primates bodies. philanthropy refers to an action done for the benefit of others through prevention/removal of harm (Beneficence vs. Nonmaleficence par.1). The principle demands that all physicians should refrain from harming their patients. The researchers in Philadelphia, therefore, through causing the baboons tremendous levels of pain, disregarded the need to take in the principle of beneficence. The painful act also illustrates a significant deal of injustice to the animal. I am of the opinio n that, even if an animal has to die,