Costs and Manufacturing Overhead

1. How much(prenominal) budget items speak to would be salve by outsourcing production of muffler-exhaust systems and anoint pans if a. Overhead be were entirely heady be?$0 would be saved beca engagement refractory monetary values do non affected by reduced figure of agitate caused by outsourcing. b. Overhead costs were entirely variable costs? (How is volume of act postingd at Bridgeton? Why is volume not measured by simply counting units produced?) All of them would be saved. If apply numbers in 1988 for estimate, (5,766,000+6,532,000)*434% = $53,373,320 would be saved.Bridgeton accumulates both manufacturing bang costs into oneness cost pool, and use direct labor dollar cost as the apiece(prenominal)ocation measure to apportion the operating expense costs in the cost pool.Unlike direct labor and direct material costs that can be traced to detail products, overhead costs could be administrative and manufacturing related so that not all of them are involved in ACFs production. Therefore, in that location isnt a high degree of correlation between the units produced and the do of manufacturing overhead used.2. How much overhead cost do you think Bridgeton and the consultants implicitly assumed would be saved by outsourcing muffler-exhaust systems and oil pans? They expect all overhead specific to product line of Muffler Exhaust systems and oil pans would be saved, which is ($5,766,000+6,532,000)*434% = $533,733,20 (using 1988 selective information for estimate).3. Calculate the overhead allocation rate for each of the model eld 1988 through 1990. Are the changes since 1987 in overhead allocation rates satisfying? Why have these changes occurred? a) divide heart and soul overhead ($) by total direct labor ($) showed in Exh.2 to get overhead rate. 1987 1988 1989 1990Overhead graze 437% = 107,954/24,682 434% = 109,890/25,294 577% = 78,157/13,537 563% = 79,393/14,102Costs and Manufacturing OverheadBridgeton Industries Case Assignment Q uestions1. How much overhead cost would be saved by outsourcing production of muffler-exhaust systems and oil pans if a. Overhead costs were entirely fixed costs?$0 would be saved because fixed costs do not affected by reduced number of labor caused by outsourcing. b. Overhead costs were entirely variable costs? (How is volume of activity measured at Bridgeton?Why is volume not measured by simply counting units produced?) All of them would be saved. If using numbers in 1988 for estimate, (5,766,000+6,532,000)*434% = $53,373,320 would be saved.Bridgeton accumulates all manufacturing overhead costs into one cost pool, and use direct labor dollar cost as the allocation measure to apportion the overhead costs in the cost pool.Unlike direct labor and direct material costs that can be traced to specific products, overhead costs could be administrative and manufacturing related so that not all of them are involved in ACFs production. Therefore, there isnt a high degree of correlation betwe en the units produced and the amount of manufacturing overhead used.2. How much overhead cost do you think Bridgeton and the consultants implicitly assumed would be saved by outsourcing muffler-exhaust systems and oil pans? They expect all overhead specific to product line of Muffler Exhaust systems and oil pans would be saved, which is ($5,766,000+6,532,000)*434% = $533,733,20 (using 1988 data for estimate).3. Calculate the overhead allocation rate for each of the model years 1988 through 1990. Are the changes since 1987 in overhead allocation rates significant? Why have these changes occurred? a) divide total overhead ($) by total direct labor ($) showed in Exh.2 to get overhead rate. 1987 1988 1989 1990Overhead Rate 437% = 107,954/24,682 434% = 109,890/25,294 577% = 78,157/13,537 563% = 79,393/14,102