We Must Never Surrender the Right of Open Discussion :: September 11 Terrorism Essays

We Must Never Surrender the amend of Open Discussion As a nation, we need thoughtful give-and-take concerning the September 11 attacks. In a time when open interchange is more(prenominal) necessary than ever, it is discouraging to see simple questions about our nations interests, pose in these forums, branded as anti-American, inappropriate, or as enemies within. Now more than ever, careful and respectful debate can grant us the informational dexterity needed to maintain an open and neutral perspective as events unfold. I am an American. This countrys social infrastructure, built with tremendous difficulty on the backs of galore(postnominal) who sacrificed their lives for their country as well as those who sometimes unwittingly demonstrate themselves in the path of the nations maturation, is unique and valuable. It grants its citizens the opportunity for growth, unparalleled freedoms, and the means to furbish up injustice. We are truly a great nation. Times of duress nam e to our minds the patriotic respect and admiration we have for our country, and bring us to accredit just how fortunate we are to live in such a nation. As an American, I refuse to surrender the ability and willingness to think openly, critically, and analytically about issues in our society and in our world. I will not allow the privileges of freedom and opportunity crafted so carefully in the charge of the last two hundred-plus years to blind me to mistakes weve made and mistakes we continue to make. I will not surrender to the demands for unity and compliance in the pastime of vengeance. We owe it both to ourselves and to those who have come before us to maintain a reasoned, simple honesty in assessing the state of the world. Those who bring vigour more to the public forum than reactionary and manipulative accusations of anti-Americanism do disservice to themselves, their country, and to reasonable thought. It is hard, though, to keep thoughts clear-headed and words wel l-conceived during a storm as enigmatical as we face now. A sharp exchange of writings among Noam Chomsky and Christopher Hitchens, a columnist for The Nation, was a visible sign of the heightened tensions that try tempers and weaken judgment. David Talbot and Andrew Sullivan, both respected political writers, engaged in a resembling exchange. There is reason for anxiety. The initial highly-visible strikes against our country have yielded to an anonymous, growing burgeon forth of threats and attacks, currently in the form of anthrax-laced mailings, that lack the visibility and impact of traditionalistic acts of war but nonetheless foster a sense of veneration and vulnerability.