'How Austen creates her novel “Pride and Prejudice” Essay\r'

'Jane Austen was extremely modest about her genius, describing her civilize to her work to her nephew Edward as â€Å"That itsy-bitsy however (two inches wide) of ivory in which I work with so fine a brush as produces niggling effect after(prenominal) much labour.”\r\nAlthough the world of her romance â€Å"Pride and preconception” is confined to a sm wholly section of community comprising of country-gentry and lesser aristocracy of England in the opening of the nineteenth century, the impudent itself shows page by page how fire carg atomic number 53r could be, how fascinating life’s twists and turns argon, how of import the trivialities are to those concerned.\r\nThe chain of mountains of Austen’s fig handst is restrain by her own circumstances, her own sex, and her position in the society. But the little world she economizes about, she knows inside out. She fills her little world so artfully that when we are in it we do not long for both thing else and we feel its fullness as well. She practiced what she preached.\r\nâ€Å"T here are quatern families in a country village” is the rattling thing to work on. She sticks to what she knows and is refusing to include in her refreshful what does not properly belong to village life; she is an artist.\r\nAusten has an acute interest in personalities, her field is the gentlemans gentleman heart. Therefore, although she writes in the years of war between England and France bandage Napoleon was changing the map of Europe, in her novel we find not mention of â€Å"Britain at war.” In â€Å"Pride and preconception” soldiers like Wickham, come to Meryton to provide, in a sense, amusement for the girls. Austen thus does not chitchat anything harsh or unnecessary on her novel; this all(a)udes to the artistic unity of her creation. She consciously limits herself and does not write anything beyond her experience. It may well be mentioned here that in  "A Room One’s Own” Virginia Woolf pays a rich tri notwithstandinge to Austen by mentioning that novels like â€Å"War and Peace” could never be written by any female novelist, but certainly no Tolstoy could ever write the novels of Jane Austen.\r\nAusten purposely and wisely limits herself to a fewer families and a express mail number of characters in â€Å"Pride and Prejudice”. Her characters lie in in comfort in country houses; their lives incorporate of holding balls, attending parties, visiting each another(prenominal)’s house and thus amusing themselves. In that society even a small situation is given a higher importance. Thereby a ball at the Bingleys or at the Lucases is thirstily anticipated and minutely analyzed.\r\nAusten chooses her characters from very ordinary life. Her characters range from the proud aristocrat Darcy to the dull-witted Mrs. Bennet, from the wide-cut-natured Jane to the hypocritical fall behind Bingley. The men -folks in her novel do not in fact do nay work whereas the infantile girls are always in pursuit of good husbands. The girls have somehow managed to turn themselves into husband chase butterflies. Distant Pembrly, Netherfield and Rosings are the upper limit, whereas Sir W Lucas and gentlewoman Catherine Debourgh are highest in rank, the still higher estates and greater aristocracy are not mentioned in the novel, since they little effect Meryton and Derbyshire.\r\nThe way Austen treats her characters is sarcastic. Her run intos of life are indeed always satiric; the fiery and tragic aspects of serviceman life are somehow discarded. Only such characters are chosen that could be satirically treated. This satiric vision of life is a limitation on Austen’s part. Critics sometimes mention that Austen â€Å"Banished nine-tenth of life, and gave us hatful who never work, or fight or die, or starve or go crazy.”\r\nIn the view of that above-mentioned statement we find that people in â€Å"Pride and Prejudice” engage themselves in doing nothing. Mr. Darcy evidently fitms to have some work to do when he is at Pemberly, the work he does in that respect is obviously connected with his estate. Mr. Gardiner revels in fishing barely. Mr. Bennet, as we are told, takes one of his farms but only emerges from his library when he needs to settle some family affairs. Mr. Hurst’s motto of life is â€Å"High living and little thinking.” rendition has a place in family entertainment and since all the novels are heard at family gatherings, the writers take wangle to fill up pages fit for family consumption.\r\nIn fact, Austen’s knowledge of men’s ways limited, but she knew how to use her limitation. In â€Å"Pride and Prejudice” men come and go, and sit and chat when in comportment of the ladies; Austen does not pursue them into their personal world. We may see Fitz William Darcy and Bingley set off in a motorc oach but what they discuss is never reported if no woman is insert. Despite Austen’s failure to present the many facets of men’s life, she is successful in providing an illuminating insight into some of the most evidential characters like that of Darcy and Bingley.\r\nFor instance, Darcy’s transmigration from a proud and snout person to a compassionate and reliable one is shown with perfect dexterity. In this novel Austen does want to compete with students of political economics, or favorable problems. The life and its complications that she depicts are just as what she experienced as a woman. Quite naturally her themes in this novel stub the complex role of money and love in marriage. In doing so she even consciously avoids any discussion on philosophical or social issues. A simple speckle concerning a few number of people is woven in this novel.\r\nThat Austen has no wish to exceed the limitation of her own is instead evident when we find that urban li fe is excluded from the novel only because she had not much experience of it. It is mentioned nervelessly during Jane’s visit to London. We have also ascertained that no b neglect-hearted villain ever makes an appearance in Austen’s pages. The greatest villainy that ever occurs in â€Å"Pride and Prejudice” is the occasional elopement of Lydia with Wickham. Wickham indeed lacks all those negative traits of character which could have made him a person of shade like that of Alec in tough’s â€Å"Tess of the D’urbervilles”. Therefore, Wickham’s possibility to be the only villain in â€Å"Pride and Prejudice” ends there.\r\nStill it is no shallowness or lack of insight on Austen’s part, which leads her to restrict the exploration of human nature to the apparent social level. Austen gives us in her novel an artistic unity in which nothing is forced, nothing is excessive. A simple plot proceeds bit by bit to the only conclus ion possible. Her characters act and speak in a very familiar way as we throw out imagine. The characters are so true to nature and so well-balanced against constructing types that as they talk along the flooring we begin to think that it would not matter if there were no plot. The central figures whose union we desire change by reversal upon us as their mistakes and recoveries reveal the fineness of their spirit. Therefore, in Austen’s world there is a accept for the sensitive reader who will accept it as it is and will not cry out for, in the words of one critic â€\r\nâ€Å"The moon of passionate embraces or the lightning of sword.”\r\n'