The atomic bomb created an explosion equivalent to 20,000 tons of TNT, which if utilize on people, would be morally abhorrent; therefore, the atomic ordnance should not be used without sound reasoning. By looking for at previous battles with the japanese, the alternative to the atomic bomb, a set down invasion, would result in a loss of millions of lives. The repercussions of not move bombs would be devastating to both Japan and the United States. The move of atomic bombs on Japan was necessary because the bomb save lives of civilians and sol founderrs, the Japanese would not issue an unconditional surrender, and it showed the world our commodious power.
Dropping the bombs allowed the war to end sooner and with fewer casualties. In the fiber of an invasion of Japan, millions of casualties were judge. It was clear that the Japanese civilians were going to join the fight, so arguing that the atomic bomb brought unwarranted civilian deaths is incorrect. Children were macrocosm trained to be carpet bombers, dying honorable deaths by strapping explosives to themselves and blowing themselves up while underneath tanks. The American casualties were expected to be in the hundred-thousands, because in previous fights, such as the Battle of Okinawa when the American deaths totaled 18,000 and the Japanese 120,000.
Also, when we invaded, the Japanese would confuse executed hundreds of thousands of Allied POWs, which were freed when Japan surrendered after the atomic bombings. If we try to occupy Japan, like how we are occupying Iraq, there would be thousands of deaths from terrorist attacks. Moreover, the Japanese believe that the most glorious and honorable way to die is in battle, because it will please the Emperor. The daunting task of invading, securing, and occupying Japan would be bloody and probably take years. The simplicity...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper