Gay Marriages

The issue, gay conjoinding activists argue, is unity of equality. Homo inners are denied the legal rights and privileges bestowed on married couples, including the right to keep back health related decisions in hospitals and to inherit an estate when a partner dies. Indeed, "In the modern administrative state, elegant espousal condenses within a single docu ment a commodious array of legal, financial, and medical rights and benefits" (Haslett). Proponents of Gay espousal argue that denying these rights establish solely on sexuality is akin to the segregation of blacks in the South. Opponents of Gay conjugation also acknowledge the uniqueness and immensity of marriage as an institution. It is precisely for this reason that they oppose standing homosexuals to join forces in matrimony. Gay marriage would redefine the institution, leading pack to no longer believe that "the central purpose of marriage is to bind men and women exclusively to each other and to the children that their sexual behavior is apt to produce. It will communicate instead that marriage was created to gratify grown-ups by reinforcing their committed romantic relationships" (Jacoby). This change in definition will erode the traditional roles held by men and women in a marriage, according to opponents, and lead society mickle a slippery slope towards a point in time where even polygamy could be condoned as a financial support of a committed relationship.

The real issue at tidy sum seems to me to be the notion

Gay marriage proponents are unhappy with the idea of well-behaved unions, however. Civil unions allow gay couples to wed in one state, but the benefits they chance on are not transferable to other states. Additionally, genteel unions do not look up important federal benefits that honorable bring up marriage confers. Proponents of Gay marriage note that civil unions confer a "separate but equal" right to gays.

Indeed, "Plessey's school of thought of separate but equal has long since been abandoned, and is considered a cross on America's past. The two-tiered approach to marriage revives this discredited idea" (Hirsch). Thus, opponents to civil unions invoke the separate but equal doctrine to overthrow its validity.

Haslett, Adam; "Love Supreme: Gay Nuptials and the making of Modern Marriage," The New Yorker, May 24, 2004.

of civil union versus full fledged marriage. If the main reason that Gay couples wish to wed is so that they can enjoy the legal privileges associated with marriage, then legalizing same-sex civil unions would seem to adequately address gay concerns. Indeed, "This is the difference amongst civil unions and marriage: one is a legal security department and the other is a public endorsement. Not surprisingly, many Americans who efficacy support the first remain uncomfortable with the second" (Haslett). This temper was loudly proclaimed at America's polling booths this November 2nd.

I believe that civil unions would allow gay coupl
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!