Citizen Avoidance Of Jury Duty: How Government Is Responding To A Traditional Problem In The Justice System.

Citizen Avoidance of Jury DutyIncidence of gore duty no-show is not a surprise in many courts in the join States . Despite that there are as of yet , no official chassised estimates of the non-appearance of citizens in this age-old duty , the American courtroom Society believes that this has been a big concern with epidemic proportions in several places in the countrified Considerably large and change areas like Atlanta , Houston and Miami reported up to fifty percent no-show rates , this according to USA to daytime (November 2006 . fit to a mull over by Nancy King , which traces three centuries of umpire system , instrument panel dodging and juror shortages portray a system in crisis (Jury Delinquency in Criminal Trials , 1796-1996 . This fact-finding research looked into cases of individual juror conduct (or misconduct ) and the augment of such cases in the system . In separate study made by West (Columbia Law Review 1992 , the tec presented a historical view on various well-grounded systems across civilizations up to the present one . Although the study is an preliminary to a Japanese judge system , the material and learning are sources of rich evidence supporting the continuance of the control board system and its efficacyThe question any serious and inquiring opinion would raise is why this non-appearance why make excuses as to the softness to render service or practically ridicule the legal system this country has created and which is mandated by the constitution ? What consequences does the public gestate from the actions of certain citizens on jury duty ? Is the problem that usual or are there no significant issues on this concern ? These questions are going to be addressed found on the literature as evidenced in the satisfy that followsOne of the chief reasons why people should participate in jury duty is the obvious fact that the right demands it .

The attorney ordinary of the State of Texas mentions this basic tenet in his response to a letter inquiry on the possible solutions of no-show problems in jury duty Since 1876 it has been the statutory duty of a justice of the peace to the sheriff or constable to summon a number of legally qualified jurors to attend as a jury whenever there are any jury cases pending for rivulet . The sheriff or constable is sworn to select but aboveboard , sensible , and sober men having the qualifications of jurors under the law and to do it without bias or favor toward any party (Abbott , 2005 in Tex .Att y Gen Op . No H-1204 (1978 ) at 1 (citations omittedIt is clear then that this country continues to exercise the obligations of fair and relevant form of the application of the law for everyone and this is in the belief that the jury of peers - the people of this age and day who know as well as the individual /s in question this unique period they live in , and for this reason , the people chosen (via the jury wheel later on some prior procedures ) will render a just...If you deficiency to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper